Muslim perspective mai 1985

par **Zuitouna** Sam 17 Oct - 0:28

Muslim Perspective
Monthly Bulletin of United Submitters International ***
Proclaiming the only religion acceptable to God
May 1985
[No 4]
Sha’ban 1405
Editor: Rashad Khalifa, Ph.D.

FAHD: THE LAST SAUDI KING

The Saudi tyrants have declared war on God, and God is sure to win. And the tyrants are fuming mad at me because I turned down their offer to buy me for a million dollars. They have grown accustomed to see our ‘Ulama bow down before their mighty dollar, and readily join their flimsy army of Satan.

The downfall of the Saudi dynasty is now assured. Literally millions of Muslims around the world have seen God’s miracle of Qur’an that is based on purely physical, incontrovertible facts, the Qur’an’s miraculous mathematical system.
In the face of this phenomenal popularity among all enlightened Muslims, the blind Saudi dynasty has mobilized a number of “Ulama” who are willing to make asses of themselves in return for a few dollars.

As reported in the last issue of M.P., we have witnessed the second ranking ‘Alem in the Saudi Religious Hierarchy, Sheikh Muhammad Al-Qa’ood state that BASMALA does NOT consist of 19 letters, and the Qur’an does NOT consist of 114 (19x6) Suras!!! To every Muslim who knows anything about Qur’an, these strange statements are
equivalent to saying that the sun does NOT rise from the East. How arrogant can they get??!!

I apologize to all the asses of the world for insulting them by stating that a highly placed scholar who makes such absurd statements is making an ass of himself.
Based on the word of God, that He forsakes those who forsake Him, and humiliates those who declare war on Him, I herein predict that Fahd shall be the FINAL SAUDI KING.

par **Zuitouna** Sam 17 Oct - 0:30

A PROFOUND MIRACLE:

Divine Manipulation of the Computer Produces Correct Results, regardless of human errors.

Back in 1968. I developed the hypothesis that perhaps the Qur’an’s “mysterious” alphabets (A.L.M., Q, N, T.S.M, etc.) possess specific distribution patterns within Qur’an. To test this hypothesis, I wrote the whole Qur’an into the computer, using English symbols for each Arabic character. The first output from the computer was published in 1972 in my book entitled MIRACLE OF QUR’AN: SIGNIFICANCE OF THE MYSTERIOUS ALPHABETS.” What I learned from that work was that the Qur’an’s mysterious initials occurred in their suras at the highest frequency; I knew nothing about the number 19 at that time. In retrospect, the number 19 was all over the place, as seen now on the pages of that first book, but it just was not God’s will that we see it.

What concerns me in this article is that the frequency of the letter “N ن ” where it occurs as an initial (Sura 68) appears in those first computer data, as printed in that 1972 book, as 133. This is of course the correct number, or the number that is supposed to be. However, what I fed the computer was only 132 N’s. That is because I used an Egyptian printing of Qur’an where the initial “N ن” is not spelled out, as is the case in the original Qur’an.

When it was God’s will to unveil His Miracle in Qur’an, and the role of the number 19 (see Qur’an 74:25-30), the frequency of the letter. “N ن” fit right in with the rest of the miracle, since the number 133 is a multiple of 19. A few months after publishing the results, the letters came pouring in to inform me that the frequency of the letter “N ن” is in fact 132, not 133. The absence, addition, or alteration of one word in Qur’an, of course, destroys the whole system; the whole mathematical system collapses. I then embarked on a world-wide search for the oldest Qur’ans and found out that the original Qur’an and the oldest copies did indeed spell out the Qur’anic initial “N ن” into “Noon نون”

How did the computer report the correct result, despite the error in feeding? The only answer is: Obviously, we were dealing with God’s miracle in His Final Scripture, and He has manipulated the computer to inform the world of the correct data.
The Figure below is a photocopy from the 1972 book, showing the number of N’s in Sura 68 as 133. The computer did not pay attention to the data I fed into it. How did the computer generate an extra “N ن” to give us the correct number??!!

That was not the only incident where God has manipulated the computer in order to show us His Miracle. When I wrote the Qur’an into the computer, the number of the word “Allah” that I fed to the computer was in fact 2699. This is the wrong number. But the computer gave us the number that is supposed to be, namely 2698, or 19 x 142.

What I fed into the computer included one extra word “Allah” from the last two verses of Sura 9. We know now that those two verses do not belong in Qur’an (see the March Issue of MP.). Thus, the computer did not pay any attention to the data that I fed into it. It gave us the correct count of the word “Allah” despite the erroneous feeding.

The extra word “Allah” was discovered during the comprehensive review of Qur’an and the computer data at the word for word level, MANUALLY. Ironically, the computer skipped one word “Allah” in Sura 9. In my two books reporting the results: THE COMPUTER SPEAKS: GOD’S MESSAGE TO THE WORLD & QUR’AN: VISUAL PRESENTATION OF THE MIRACLE, it was noted that the computer reported only one word “Allah” in verse 15 of Sura 9. This verse contains two, not one, word “Allah.”
When I began this computer research into Qur’an, I had pledged that I will never say anything about the mathematical system of Qur’an unless the results are “unanimous” i.e. without any discrepancies or exceptions. Had the computer reported 132 N’s back in 1972, the world would have never heard anything about the Qur’an’s mathematical miracle, at least not from me.

ALL WE CAN SAY, THEREFORE, IS “SUB-HANA ALLAH” “GOD BE GLORIFIED.”

(Rashad Khalifa)

Tableau:
http://www.masjidtucson.org/publications/books/SP/1985/may/page4.html

par **Zuitouna** Sam 17 Oct - 0:33

Lien article sous forme de journal:
http://www.quranalone.com/SP/04_1985_05.pdf

par Contenu sponsorisé

Muslim perspective mai 1985

Muslim perspective mai 1985

Re: Muslim perspective mai 1985

Re: Muslim perspective mai 1985

Re: Muslim perspective mai 1985